Modeling of Sources in the Time Domain - Practical Example with Vertical-Vertical Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Method
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anaconda Software Distribution, 2017, Computer software. version 2-2.4.0. Anaconda, Inc., Nov. Web. . Barsukov, P., E.B. Fainberg, and B.A. Singer, 2007, Method for hydrocarbon reservoir mapping and apparatus for use when performing the method: WO 2007/053025 in PCT/NO2006/000372. 40 pp.
Barsukov, P., E.B. Fainberg, and B.A. Singer, 2008, Method for mapping hydrocarbon reservoirs in shallow waters and also apparatus for use practising the method: WO 2008/066389 in PCT/NO2007/000416. 36 pp.
Cass, S., 2021, Top Programming Languages 2021 Python dominates as the de facto platform for new technologies: IEEE Spectrum, August 2021.
Castillo-Reyes, O., J. De La Puente, and J.M. Cela, 2018, PETGEM: A parallel code for 3D CSEM forward modeling using edge finite elements: Computers & Geosciences, 119, 2018, 123–136. DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104438.
Clemens, M., and T. Weiland, 2001, Discrete electromagnetism with the finite integration technique: Progress in Electromagnetic Research: PIER, 32, 65–87. DOI: 10.2528/PIER00080103.
Constable, S., and C.J. Weiss, 2007, Mapping thin resistors and hydrocarbons with marine EM methods: Insights from 1D modeling: Geophysics, 71, G43–G51. DOI: 10.1190/1.2187748.
Esmaili, R.B., 2021, Earth Observation Using Python: A Practical Programming Guide: AGU / Wiley. Special Publications, 75, Hoboken, NJ. 304 pp. DOI: 10.1002/9781119606925.
Flekkoy, E., K. Maloy, and T. Holten, 2009, Electromagnetic surveying can be done using both horizontal and vertical transmitters/receivers. To understand the Physics, it pays off to use an analogy with heat waves: GEOExPro, vol. 6 no. 4.
Frafjork, O., T. Holten, A. Kaffas, J. Borven, and S. Helwig, 2014, Minimizing the noise contribution in vertical electric field measurements: 76th EAGE Conference & Exhibition: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014. DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20141247.
Gloux, B., and T. Holten, 2009, TEMP-VEL, a different EM offshore exploration approach/technology. Case example from the Norwegian sea. NGF Abstracts and Proceedings. Norsk Geologisk Forening. Norway. no. 3, 5–7.
Heagy, L.J., R. Cockett, S. Kang, G.K. Rosenkjaer, and D.W. Oldenburg, 2017, A framework for simulation and inversion in electromagnetics: Computers & Geosciences, 107, 1–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2017.06.018.
Helwig, S., A. Kaffas, T. Holten, O. Frafjord, and K. Eide, 2013, Vertical dipole CSEM: technology advances and results from the Snøhvit field: First Break, 31, 63–68. DOI: 10.3997/1365-2397.31.4.67466. Helwig, S., W. Wood, and B. Gloux, 2019, Vertical–vertical controlled-source electromagnetic instrumentation and acquisition: Geophysical Prospecting, 67, 6, 1582–1594. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12771.
Holten, T., E. Flekkoy, B. Singer, E. Blixt, A. Hanssen, and K. Maloy, 2009a, Vertical source, vertical receiver, electromagnetic technique for offshore hydrocarbon exploration: First Break, 27, 89–93. DOI: 10.3997/1365-2397.27.1299.28934.
Holten, T., D. Veiber, and E.G. Flekkoy, 2009b, Vertical Electric Time-Domain Responses from a Vertical Current Source for Offshore Hydrocarbon Exploration: 71st EAGE Conference & Exhibition: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. DOI: 10.3997/2214- 4609.201400504.
Hunziker, J., J. Thorbecke, and E. Slob, 2015, The electromagnetic response in a layered vertical transverse isotropic medium: a new look at an old problem: Geophysics, 80, 1, F1–F18. DOI: 196 Time Domain Modeling – VVCSEM Example Braz. J. Geophys., 40, 2, 2022 10.1190/geo2013-0411.1.
Key, K., 2009, 1D inversion of multicomponent, multifrequency marine CSEM data: Methodology and synthetic studies for resolving thin resistive layers: Geophysics, 74, 2, F9–F20. DOI: 10.1190/1.3058434.
Key, K., and J. Ovall, 2012, A parallel goal-oriented adaptive finite element method for 2.5-D modelling: Geophysical Journal International, 186, 1, 137–154. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05025.x.
Kjerstad, J., 2010, Device for a vertical electromagnetic field component receiver: WO 2010/041959 in PCT/NO2009/000352. 22 p.
Rijo, L., 2007, Electrical Geophysics 2-D & 3-D Earth Modeling: Notas de aula: Programa de Pós-graduação em Geofísica – UFPA. Belém, Brazil. Rochlitz, R., N. Skibbe, and T. Günther, 2019, custEM: customizable finite element simulation of complex controlled-source electromagnetic data: Geophysics, 84, 2, F17–F33. DOI: 10.1190/geo2018-0208.1.
Saison, S., 2017, Electromagnetic Seabed Logging: A new tool for geoscientists. Springer, 536 pp. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45355-2. Souza, D.M., M.W.C. Silva, and V.C.T.
Souza, 2022, VVCSEM repository. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6369599. Werthmüller, D., 2017, An open-source full 3D electromagnetic modeler for 1D VTI media in Python: empymod: Geophysics, 82, 6, WB9–WB19. DOI: 10.1190/geo2016-0626.1.
Werthmüller, D., W.A. Mulder, and E.C. Slob, 2019, emg3d: A multigrid solver for 3D electromagnetic diffusion: Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 39, 1463. DOI: 10.21105/joss.01463.
Werthmüller, D., W.A. Mulder, and E.C. Slob, 2021, Fast Fourier transformation of electromagnetic data for computationally expensive kernels: Geophysical Journal International, ggab171. DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggab171.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22564/brjg.v40i2.2158
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
a partir do v.37n.4 (2019) até o presente
v.15n.1 (1997) até v.37n.3 (2019)
Brazilian Journal of Geophysics - BrJG
Sociedade Brasileira de Geofísica - SBGf
Av. Rio Branco 156 sala 2509
Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Phone/Fax: +55 21 2533-0064
E-mail: editor@sbgf.org.br
Since 2022, the BrJG publishes all content under Creative Commons CC BY license. All copyrights are reserved to authors.